Globe and Mail - Update December 18, 2007
Following up on their united pledge of last week to make more money available for terms that extended into the new year, the European Central Bank, the Bank of England and the Bank of Canada flooded short-term credit markets with accessible cash. The U.S. Federal Reserve made its own injections on Monday.
The flood of cash has greased the wheels in many short-term credit markets, ensuring that commercial banks have enough money on hand to tie up loose ends before the New Year and fund Christmas shoppers' annual needs for liquidity.
While much of the intervention had been foreshadowed by the joint announcement last week, the ECB took markets by surprise by going well beyond its initial intentions. It infused about $500-billion (U.S.) into money markets – the largest injection yet for that central bank, and one that was quickly gobbled up by some 390 financial institutions.
The Bank of Canada infused $2-billion (Canadian) into short-term markets, more than the $1-billion it announced as a minimum last week.
When the five European and North American central banks made their announcement last week, many analysts were skeptical that liquidity injections into short-term money markets would do anything substantial to ease the credit squeeze that threatens to undermine economic growth.
But since then, economists have lowered their expectations, and aren't looking to the central banks to solve the credit issues. Rather, they say the central banks' role at this point is simply to make sure money markets are liquid enough to remain functioning while commercial banks sort out their exposure to U.S. subprime loans.
Essentially, the central banks have bought commercial banks some time to figure out their losses, said Stewart Hall, market strategist at HSBC (Canada.).
“Large banks are now awash with cash. The issue is not whether they have enough cash, it is whether they are inclined to lend,” the Bank of England's governor, Mervyn King, said yesterday.
At the core of their unwillingness to lend is fear about losses connected to failing subprime loans.
Analysts believe the exposure will amount to at least $300-billion (U.S.) on the balance sheets of commercial banks, and only about $80-billion of that has been officially acknowledged.
Interbank lending is priced high because lenders don't know where the rest of the losses are hidden, Mr. Luxton said.
REM: Do you really think this is the solution? The word on the street is that this is not a liquidity problem but a solvency problem. Do you agree or disagree?